AI Security

Find the weaknesses in your AI system before an attacker does

A focused security review of one LLM application, RAG system, or AI agent: threat model, control review, and authorized adversarial testing.

AI Security Assessment

AI systems introduce attack paths traditional application security testing does not cover: prompt injection through user input and retrieved content, sensitive data disclosure, excessive agent permissions, insecure output handling, and model and plugin supply chain risk.

The assessment examines how your system actually handles untrusted input, what it can reach, and what it is allowed to do — then validates the highest-risk paths with testing performed only under written rules of engagement.

What you receive

  • Architecture and data-flow diagram of the AI system and its trust boundaries
  • Threat model mapped to MITRE ATLAS and the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications
  • Control review: input handling, retrieval, tool and agent permissions, output handling, secrets, logging, model supply chain
  • Adversarial test results for prompt injection, data exfiltration, and privilege misuse
  • Findings rated by severity with specific remediation guidance
  • Retest of remediated critical and high findings within 60 days

How the engagement runs

Scope and authorize

Define the system, environments, and test boundaries; sign rules of engagement.

Model the threats

Map architecture, data flows, and trust boundaries; build the threat model.

Review and test

Assess controls against the threat model and run authorized adversarial tests.

Report and retest

Severity-rated findings, remediation walkthrough with engineering, and retest.

Frameworks and standards

MITRE ATLASOWASP Top 10 for LLM ApplicationsNIST AI 100-2 (Adversarial ML)NIST SP 800-218ACISA/NCSC Secure AI Development GuidelinesCSA AI Controls Matrix

Questions

Is this a penetration test?

It includes targeted adversarial testing, but the emphasis is design and control weaknesses specific to AI. It complements, rather than replaces, your standard application penetration test.

Do you test in production?

Only with explicit written authorization. The default is a non-production environment that mirrors production configuration.

We use a third-party model provider. What is in scope?

Your integration: prompts, retrieval, tools, permissions, data handling, and logging. The provider's own infrastructure is covered through vendor due diligence, not testing.

Know where your AI governance program stands

A free 30-minute gap check with a written one-page readout. No sales deck.

Request a Free AI Governance Gap Check